Week commencing 31 July 2006

Oil Market

 

 Weekly Chart Spot

US Profits

 

Access to Content

 

Use The Articles For Client Communications

thebigpicture articles are available for financial advisers to use in communications with their clients. More...

 

If this email does not appear correctly, please view it in your web browser.

Oil Market: Down to the Refineries

The fundamentals of the oil market still do not look as radically different as US$75.00+ prices might suggest. 

The table set out below summarizes the state of the global oil market for the past five years with an estimate for 2006 and a 2007 forecast

The historical information comes from the statistical database of the Organization Of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). The global demand and non OPEC supply estimates for 2006 and 2007 also come from OPEC

For 2006 and 2007, the table has been balanced by assuming OPEC will produce whatever is needed to make up any shortfall between non OPEC supply and world demand.  This assumption is consistent with OPEC’s actual production strategy

Word Oil Demand & Supply Balance

Such an assumption implies that the level of OPEC stocks at the end of 2007 will be the same as it was at the end of 2005 so that, relative to demand, stocks will be edging slightly lower. In practice, OPEC is likely to produce a little over what the world will need to break even and stocks should be slightly higher than assumed in the table

However, with stocks currently equivalent to around 60 days of demand, they are hardly any different from what they were in 2002 so that, from a purely analytical perspective, there appears to have been little reason for prices to have jumped so much higher since then.  

That is good news but likely to invite comments about how geopolitical influences are primarily responsible for higher prices which are unlikely to go away any time soon. 

The data also seem clear on another point.  The refining bottleneck is the continuing culpritThe weekly chart spot this week reprises the refining capacity - price relationship.  This framework provides the clearest sense that prices reflect a shortage of refining capacity.  It suggests that, whatever the state of international political relationships, prices would have probably moved higher.  

This might offer some solace to petrol consumers. A fresh round of investment in refining capacity - even enough to open just a 5% a gap between capacity and production - might be enough to force prices substantially below where they have been in recent times.

back to top

Weekly Chart Spot

Availability of oil refinery capacity seems to be an important determinant of oil prices.  The chart shows the relationship over the past 20 years between international crude oil prices (on the vertical axis) and excess refinery capacity (on the horizontal axis).

The relationship suggests that prices have been responding to the elimination of excess refining capacity as demand has been growing without a corresponding investment in processing capacity.

back to top

US Profits: How Cost Control is Still Helping

Despite almost daily mood swings among commentators about the U.S. economy, business profitability there has remained remarkably robust. 

Over the year to the March quarter of 2006, U.S. after-tax profits rose by a healthy 17.6%.  In the six years since the turn of the century, profits have expanded at an average 16.5% a year and, as the chart suggests, their ascent is showing few signs of flagging. 

While there have been many contributing factors to this outstanding performance, two are worth highlighting for their continuing impact.

·         Firstly, there has been a disciplined approach to business planning. After the experience of the previous cycle, managers have refrained from committing to employment or investment unless the need has been clear-cut to make subsequent adjustments smoother and less damaging to profit outcomes.

·         Related to this, cost control has been exemplary with highly competitive global markets enforcing a long term change in culture. 

One indicator of the extent of corporate cost containment is available from the macroeconomic labour productivity and cost measures released by the US government.  Real unit labour costs, shown in the second chart, takes account of three determinants of profit: wages, labour productivity and prices. 

If labour productivity (i.e. output per hour worked) is growing faster than wages, unit labour costs are declining and operating profits should be rising.  

If, at the same time, the price a business receives for its output is rising faster than unit labour costs, real (i.e. price adjusted) unit labour costs will be falling and operating margins should be widening

The most recent U.S. data, for the period over the year to the March quarter, showed productivity up by 2.5% and hourly compensation rates 2.8% higher within the non-farm business sector of the U.S. economy

With labour costs running slightly ahead of productivity increases, there was a small nominal cost squeeze. However, this was more than compensated for by a 3.2% rise in prices, a higher rate of increase than at any time since the early 1990s

This commercial windfall resulted in a 2.8% decline in real unit labour costs - taking them below levels reached in the mid 1990s at the time of the previous cyclical peak in U.S. business profitability

While these statistics are a little outdated insofar as they are now five months old - numbers for the second quarter will be available at the end of August - they offer an insight on three issues. 

·         Although the value of the accumulating profitability might have been muted by a long succession of interest rate rises, it provides an important determinant of long term market value likely to become more evident as the next downcycle in interest rates occurs, as it inevitably will

·         The new business culture which first became evident in the early 1990s and which has resulted in such profit focused managers seems to be a continuing feature of U.S. economic and business conditions

·         While companies have been relying more on prices recently to keep profits growing strongly, they appear to have taken advantage of conditions opportunistically rather than being forced to use prices as the only way to achieve better financial outcomes or as the sole means of protecting their positions

The last of these three has broader implications.  If business remains capable of delivering acceptable profit outcomes with only limited recourse to more aggressive price settings, policy makers can be more relaxed about upward pressures on inflation

back to top

Publisher

thebigpicture is published by thebigpicture Economics (ABN 71 040 787 936). The author, John A Robertson, while working in Australia, London and New York, has had over 25 years experience in international financial and commodity markets, corporate strategy, financial and business evaluation and government policy.

As Chief Economist and a director of a leading Australian investment bank as well as a top-rated institutional equity analyst, he has marketed investment advice in all the major international financial centres.  As a professional economist, he was also a senior member of John Howard's personal staff when the current Prime Minister was Commonwealth Treasurer.

His work as a senior corporate finance executive in several public companies in the mining, consumer goods and IT industries complements a unique perspective in analyzing Australian companies and the environment in which they operate.

John Robertson provides investment advisory services to wealth managers including advice on asset allocation methodologies, portfolio construction and client communication programmes. He also advises companies on their capital market communications and financial strategies.

back to top

Content for Advisers

 thebigpicture is a weekly, independently authored review covering topics selected  from:

  • domestic and international economics;

  • corporate governance and business policy; and,

  • market valuation.

Each article is written to provide decision making guideposts for private portfolio investors.

If you are a financial adviser, you can use thebigpicture content in communications with your clients either in your own newsletter or as a re-branded product. 
 

Choose your level of service...

There are five levels to the content service offered by thebigpicture Economics. Tailor a service to meet your needs.  Choose from:

  1. using individual articles from the weekly review for reproducing in your client newsletter (order here)

  2. thebigpicture library of articles published since 2002 for use in client communications

  3. updates of earlier articles on request where there might be more recent data, new information available or a sudden fresh interest in a topic

  4. specially commissioned or customized content for your client communications

  5. face-to-face presentations on current and prospective market conditions

The emphasis is on high quality, well-researched analysis of a standard which would be acceptable to a professional investment manager.

If you are a financial adviser and wish to use thebigpicture content for communications with your clients, click here or contact admin@thebigpicture.com.au or phone on 03 9500 8391 to talk with John Robertson.

back to top

Disclaimers & Privacy

thebigpicture is published by thebigpicture Economics (ABN 71 040 787 936). While the information contained in this publication has been prepared with all reasonable care from sources believed to be reliable, no responsibility or liability is accepted by the publisher for any errors or omissions or misstatements however caused. Any opinions, forecasts or recommendations reflect judgements and assumptions at the date of publication and may change without notice. This publication is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment. In issuing this publication, it is not possible to take into account the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any individual recipient. Investors should obtain individual financial advice to determine their investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs before acting on any information contained in this publication. This publication is not for public circulation or reproduction whether in whole or in part and is not intended for any person other than the recipient.

Subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act, no part of this publication may, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced or transmitted without permission.

This email may contain privileged or confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering this email to the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, review, disclose, distribute or copy the contents of this email or any attachments. In this case, please immediately notify the sender by reply email, then delete this message and any attachments from your system. 

The extent and type of personal information held depends on the information you provide to thebigpicture Economics through contact e-mails or through a subscription to thebigpicture.

Any personal information received from you will only be used to respond to your requests and to provide you with information about services offered by
thebigpicture Economics. If personal information is used to inform you about thebigpicture Economics services, you will be given a chance to decline to receive such communications.

thebigpicture Economics does not share personal information with third parties except as may be required by law or legal processes. Personal information is neither sold nor bought.

Click here if you do not wish to receive any further messages from thebigpicture Economics

thebigpicture Economics
ABN 71 040 787 936
PO Box 1870, Armadale  Vic   3143
Phone: 03 9500 8391